Happy Mind: The Philosophy and Science of Happiness

Main Menu
Home
Editorials
Ethics
Philosophy of Mind
Psychology
Futurology
Reviews
Short Stories
Miscellaneous
Health & Beauty
All Articles
Search
Links
About Us
Our Team
Contributing
Administrator
Joomla! License
Syndicate
Welcome to Happy Mind
Monday, 18 September 2006
Welcome to Happy Mind!
Welcome to Happy Mind!
Image by Squiddly.

Welcome to Happy Mind: The Philosophy and Science of Happiness, an online magazine which explores the idea of using science to promote happiness and well-being. We aim to encourage intelligent debate, rather than promote a specific position, and you will find in here articles spanning a variety of subjects - including philosophy, psychology, health, technology and futurology

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 13 December 2006 )
 
The World in 2030
Thursday, 21 September 2006
Richard Power describes the world in 2030 as he imagined it would be in his novel Mistica, the first of a planned science fiction trilogy which attempts to anticipate developments during the 21st Century.
 
Domestic environment

The world in 2030 was in many ways unchanged since the end of the 20th Century. Most people lived in houses built before 2000; roads, pavements and gardens had changed little; tables, chairs, beds, cutlery and flooring were often several decades old; food was essentially the same. Of course novel products were available. New houses could be assembled from light prefabricated units, easily replaced or re-arranged if a change in architectural design was needed. Furniture could also be made from lighter, softer, more flexible materials, or seeded with useful devices such as network sensors or local information stores. As well as traditional food you could experiment with artificial meat or alcohol-free wine. But these novelties were not yet majority tastes: by and large people kept to cheaper traditional products that worked almost as well.
 
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 06 December 2006 )
Read more...
 
Utilitarian Risk (Non)aversion
Thursday, 21 September 2006
Webmaster[at]utilitarian-essays.com argues on utilitarian grounds that longer-term advocacy can be better than direct charity and small probabilities deserve greater consideration than they are usually afforded.
 
One of the reasons why people often focus on direct charity instead of longer-term advocacy is that the results of charity are certain. A person can immediately see pets being taken care of when she volunteers at an animal shelter; it's less clear that she'll actually prevent animal suffering by handing out a few leaflets on factory farming. Yet, I think the latter option is the better of the two. Indeed, in this essay, I'll argue that high-risk, high-payoff projects can often be ethically optimal and that small probabilities deserve greater consideration than they are usually afforded.
 
Last Updated ( Thursday, 07 December 2006 )
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Results 29 - 32 of 32